About Us
|
|
“Good Enough” Isn’t Good Enough Anymore
In the face of a business environment that is ever-changing and changing
at an ever-increasing rate, the success of a business is becoming increasingly
tied to its ability to do business in an open, highly dynamic, highly
integrated way — sensing and responding to the changing market and
to the changing demands of its customers. Legacy applications, which are
self-contained and hard-wired with proprietary business logic and data,
most often lack the flexibility needed to adapt to changing business requirements.
Developed on and optimized for unique legacy platforms, they are difficult
to integrate with one another or with emerging Web technologies.
Companies that once felt that their legacy applications were performing
acceptably now find it unacceptable that aging, inflexible technology
is becoming one of the main inhibitors in executing business strategy.
Companies looking to develop new products and services and get them to
market quickly are starting to see how legacy systems may be a bottleneck
in this process. Other companies that are exploring growth through mergers
or acquisitions are constantly frustrated by proprietary systems that
may be difficult or impossible to integrate with those of a potential
target or partner. And with recent changes in regulatory requirements
complicating any potential strategic moves, businesses are starting to
look at how their legacy systems may be slowing down their ability to
comply with these regulations.
At the same time, the maintenance of these legacy systems is becoming
an increasingly costly burden. In an era of dramatically reduced IT spending,
legacy application maintenance represents a major fixed cost. A 2003 study
estimated that 80 percent of IT systems were running on legacy platforms.1
And complicating the maintenance of these systems is the fact that the
applications that they're running today are far different in form from
the applications as they were originally developed. Years of enhancements
and changes to the applications have increased their complexity and their
proprietary nature. As the original developers of these applications retire,
specific knowledge of these applications is lost to the enterprise. And
at a time when companies are facing a general skills shortage, it is difficult
to recruit new workers skilled in working on systems that may have been
developed before they were even born.
|
|
|